Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62024CN0654

Case C-654/24, Bariello: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna (Italy) lodged on 8 October 2024 – M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito

OJ C, C/2024/7309, 16.12.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7309/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7309/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2024/7309

16.12.2024

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna (Italy) lodged on 8 October 2024 – M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito

(Case C-654/24, Bariello)  (1)

(C/2024/7309)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: M.M.

Defendant: Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito

Question referred

1.

Must clause 4 of the framework agreement in Directive 1999/70/EC (2) be interpreted (including for the purposes of the effectiveness of EU law and the guarantee of an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 47 of the Charter) as precluding the limitations set out in the grounds (in the event of the applicant no longer being included in the education system) introduced by national case-law in the award of the teacher’s card and, therefore, is it necessary and sufficient, including for former teachers (persons outside the education system), in order to receive payment of the sums to which they would have been entitled during the course of their employment relationship under the teaching card (EUR 500 per year), to submit an application to the courts for payment of those sums, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the teaching card or directly in money which is legal tender, without any further burdens being imposed in relation to applications, allegations or proof ?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)   OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7309/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top
OSZAR »